Project 8200

In 1973 Pat Price, a former police officer in Burbank, California, embarked on a “remote viewing” investigation of four underground UFO bases on his own, without a monitor or established protocols and while working for SRI International as a private contractor. When Price offered his self-engendered transcript to SRI personnel, they were greatly surprised as they had not tasked him with this “remote viewing” exercise.

Years later (when things had quieted down about this incident), and Star Gate personnel were being trained at SRI International in Menlo Park, California, at Fort Meade, Maryland, and in New York with Ingo Swann, Dr. Puthoff revealed Price’s UFO/UAP isolated “remote viewing” activity to Skip Atwater and let him know he had made some hushed inquiries based on the information in Price’s transcript. The INSCOM Star Gate remote viewing unit at Fort Meade, Maryland, did initiate a challenge target training program called Project 8200 regarding Pat Price’s investigation of four underground UFO bases.

Project 8200 was a dedicated attempt to evaluate the operational capabilities and limitations of remote viewing, identifying, and developing individual remote viewing skills, and testing and evaluating the accuracy of remote viewing on unique targets.  I used Price’s transcripts and information provided by Dr. Harold Puthoff, to put together targeting folders to use for this Star Gate challenge target training. None of the results of Project 8200 training sessions were ever reported up the chain of command.  

About the author:

The author is among the early voices advocating for remote viewing (RV). He is almost solely responsible for the establishment and continuation of an RV Intelligence Collection Capability in the Department of Defense. He had the foresight to take the work of Pat Price, a legendary remote viewer, and expand upon it, using assets available to him. He then documented and maintained that research until a time when it could be presented as a serious scientific endeavor. Ten years ago, this book would have been science fiction speculation. Today it is one more brick in the wall documenting a non-human presence on our planet.

William G. Ray (Major, US Army, ret.)
Former commander, Star Gate Remote Viewing unit

From the Foreword of the book:

I can attest to the solid protocols Skip used in working with us to execute these taskings. Today in the modern remote viewing community it seems almost as if everyone and their dog is inclined to “remote view aliens,” and they often (though not always) try it in a scientifically sloppy way that all but guarantees false-positives and questionable data. Skip, however, made sure we honored proper blinding protocols and other science-based requirements.

What this means, is that I am confident that the details and information I and my colleagues produced in our sessions weren’t “made up” by our conscious imaginations, and that we received no clues from Skip or from anyone or anywhere else that could have led us in certain directions. That’s not to say that I am sure that the findings presented here are “real.” They may be—I think some are. But that remains to be ascertained.

[…] Once I sat down and started going through the pages, though, I was startled to find that my sketches and description of objects I detected during my Mount Hayes session had surprising similarities to sketches of aerial craft that Price described around the mountain during his own remote viewings. What can we make of this? Maybe nothing definitive or conclusive yet. But it is at least a tantalizing bit of possible corroboration. In the Project 8200 sessions of the other four military viewers besides me there are similarities and comparisons—both among and between each of them, and also when set side-by-side with Price’s.

This book will appeal to a number of different groups. First will be those interested in the UAP (UFO) phenomenon, whether enthusiasts or those just mildly fascinated. Second will be those intrigued by remote vie­wing history and origins. A third group might be those considering doing remote viewing themselves, especially of anomalous happenings, such as UAP occurrences and the like. And, of course, there will be some who are just plain curious. Whatever your preference, Project 8200: UFO/UAP Bases and Activi­ties will be worth the time.

Paul H. Smith, PhD (Major, US Army, ret.)
Former member, Star Gate Remote Viewing Program

Mission List

The Price data describe four locations which are presupposed to be UFO bases. The sites are highly protected from discovery, mutually supportive in purpose, and very high technology. The purposes of these bases include a monitoring function.

Project 8200 data appear to confirm the existence of four subterranean sites and several remote viewers detected extraterrestrial overtones. Project 8200 data describe these sites as protected from discovery, mutually supportive in purpose, and very high technology. Project 8200 data report the purpose of these sites as benign and involving precise observation, location, relay, and perhaps some navigational use.

These data also indicate that the sites may not always be occupied and may be connected in some way with an object in deep space.
One of the trained remote viewers reported that there were more of these bases, some on the sea bed.

Project 8200-A

Mount Hayes, Alaska

N 63° 39′
W 146° 45′

Pat Price, one of the most renowned remote viewers, was the first to report the existence of an alien base under Mount Hayes. Price described seeing structures under the mountain, including tubes, tunnels, and sophisticated equipment. Further, he reported seeing strange humanoid creatures working alongside what he believed were military personnel.

“See an area filled with what appears to be computer equipment … instead of reels equipment has metallic discs. … There is a section filled with equipment …”

“ … I believe that the target is placed deep in a mountain range in a desolate area where it is virtually impossible to discover its exact location.  […] I have never seen anything that remotely resembles part of this target. It’s like asking an Aborigine, who has never seen an automobile, to crawl inside an automobile when he has no terms for screws and bolts, and seat covers and windows, and glass and metal. Even the most rudimentary parts of this thing have no terms for it. …“

“There’s a … desolate open range of mountains or high hills … Impression of something buried … See tubes, kind of like pipes, oval shapes, containers, masses of electronics, grid work of some kind.”

“… just a mess of wires, orderly as an electric, electronic component can be, … remotely controlled, as if in a rocket or engine or propulsion … the shape is tubular/circular and tapering nose, that looks very much like a missile or space vehicle thing.”

In Bill’s CRV session, he described a hollow mountain in a cold climate with electronic monitoring equipment and metallic ships which are very quick. The site had a research feeling. Bill also described “people” which were thin, unemotional, cold, and had a programmed feeling. They were strange and had a purpose and a mission. They were foreign and semi-isolated. They felt unearthly.
In Charlene’s CRV session, she described a very tall mountain in a cold climate. The mountain was hollow, and she was confused as to whether she perceived a natural or “man-made” structure. She also noted unpleasant odors at the site.
In Paul’s CRV session, he described a cluster of structures in a cold, windswept, desolate area. “People” manning the site were somewhat regimented or subdued. Cables, box-shaped electronic equipment, and large round objects which seemed to contain intense energies were also reported.
In Mel’s CRV session (with encrypted coordinates), he described a structure located within a mountain which seemed impenetrable. Mel added that it was like being inside NORAD at Cheyenne Mountain and that it was like caves with tunnels and a very large dome. The area was occupied and there was a dark, shadowy entity, features not distinct, playing a “keyboard”. At one point in the session, Mel experienced an AOL Drive of some sort of UFO.

Project 8200-B

Mount Zeil, Australia

S 23° 30′
E 132° 24′

“ … this unit appears to have the greatest number of personel. Frankly I expected this site to have the least personel. For one thing there are personel from the other three sites here. Like a rest & recreation area. … There are vehicles here from all the other sites. The “I.D.” on the units are different.”

“… Also, from now till further notice Site 4 will issue all flight orders & control all flights…”

“… The target area is underground. I perceived an entry to the underground area. … I have a very sinister feeling for this target, but it doesn’t threaten anything. It seems to be defensive in nature. I sense a feeling of control, protection, and waiting, very little activity, very few people, caretaker type.”

“… an underground cave … white dish shape … storage site … coils … boxes of electronics … can’t break it down … electronics, then not electronics, pulsing patterns, like a glow … [AOL of] all the command and control centers that I’ve ever been in.”

Project 8200-C

Monte Perdido, Spain

N 42° 40′
E 0° 02′

Several “local units” were seen in the launch recovery area.
“Local units” have a propulsion system that looks like an artificial electromagnetic field.
“All around the area (2 mile circle) there are detectors …”

“… A natural cave cleft in rocks that starts out vertically and then goes horizontally. Wires going out like an octopus to a white box. It’s kind of a grid. This white box has an upside-down plate spike running through it. … There is a dormant feeling, it’s waiting. It’s a footprint of some kind.”

“… see sheep … a natural cave … wires going out like an octopus … kind of a grid … an upside down cone, huge, spinning upwards, got edges, interconnecting points like a spider web … extreme high frequency relay …”

Project 8200-D

Mount Inyangani, Zimbabwe

S 18° 18′
E 32° 54′

“… attention was drawn to a unit that several are working on.”
“It is a tubular grid system … for ionizing a layer of air …”
Land mass and mountain ranges, two possibly three distinct mountain ranges involved here, and the mountain ranges have something to do with borders.
The target is not exposed but buried.
A tripodal object in the middle of a cleared section is just sticking out of the ground. This object is common to all sites.

“… a singular mountain and a group of high hills; jungle close … very desolate, not even animal life … sealed rock … black boxes of electronics, power pack, all suitcase size, sealed … very advanced, like I have never seen before … a concept of control, command and control.”

Video Links

Video

Remote Viewing Underground UFO Bases

Author: Frederick H. Atwater

Video

My Changes

Author: Frederick H. Atwater

Video

Brainy Ideas

Author: Frederick H. Atwater

Video

Remote Viewing or OBE

Author: Frederick H. Atwater

Video

The Power of Thought

Author: Frederick H. Atwater

Video

Q OBE

Author: Frederick H. Atwater

Video

Remote Viewing example: Joe McMoneagle

Author: Frederick H. Atwater

Video

Next

Author: Frederick H. Atwater

Documents

Report

Parapsychology in Intelligence: A Personal Review and Conclusions

Date: 1978-05-25
Author: NSA, Dr. Kenneth Kress
Resource: PDF Download

Audio Recordings

Audio File

ERV Session, 03 Aug 1982

Date: 1982 August 03
Viewer: Joe McMoneagle
Target: Mt. Zeil, Australia
© 2024 by Frederick H. Atwater

Audio File

ERV Session, 10 Aug 1982 (AM)

Date: 1982 August 10, AM
Viewer: Joe McMoneagle
Target: Mt. Perdido, Spain
© 2024 by Frederick H. Atwater

Audio File

ERV Session, 10 Aug 1982 (PM)

Date: 1982 August 10, PM
Viewer: Joe McMoneagle
Target: Mt. Inyangani, Zimbabwe
© 2024 by Frederick H. Atwater

bb-logotan@2x